From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38546 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: self contained nnfolder Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 18:31:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r8tqim9w.fsf@uwo.ca> <87zo8efblz.fsf@uwo.ca> <87ofotfv4x.fsf@uwo.ca> <873d65kku6.fsf@uwo.ca> <87wv3gl3dw.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174392 23098 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:26:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 29076 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2001 16:32:23 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 16:32:23 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id SAA16373; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:31:53 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id SAA12692; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:31:49 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id E064520B0; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:31:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Dan Christensen In-Reply-To: <87wv3gl3dw.fsf@uwo.ca> (Dan Christensen's message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2001 11:07:07 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106 Original-Lines: 34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38546 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38546 Dan Christensen writes: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > >> So even if you don't mention `archive' anywhere in your init files, it >> might still be there. > > Yes, but you said that Gnus got confused because it knew it created > it, but I deleted it. But there is no way that Gnus can know that it > created it, as far as I can tell, since I've deleted all traces of it. Maybe Gnus always expects an archive server to be there, since it creates it at startup. >> I think the best way to remove the superfluous archive server is to >> tell Gnus to use a different server, instead. For example: >> >> (setq gnus-message-archive-method (car gnus-secondary-select-methods)) >> >> Does that work? > > No, as I've described. Hm. Hmmm. The first entry in gnus-secondary-select-methods, does that look like (nnfolder "" ...) or does it look like "nnfolder:"? I was assuming the former. Maybe (setq gnus-message-archive-method (gnus-server-to-method (car gnus-secondary-select-methods))) does the trick, if it's the latter. kai --=20 Symbol's function definition is void: signature