From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33904 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: C-c C-m or C-c RET? Date: 26 Dec 2000 23:50:06 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169925 27603 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:12:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE1AD049E for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 17:58:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB22157; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:50:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:49:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14914 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:49:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435A7D049E for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 17:50:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id XAA03219 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:50:07 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA13918; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:50:07 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA29669; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:50:07 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: /B3twq_DELA4]7alR?%xv(/f1N;bi:NN=UlA=(1a"pKte&5/Y/9*z&8q[P}+}YgJX_9*}k_ 0E|EJBC~yEok<#VOw:9GQWq1-;PCR-hd;3|Vk]~"|EM{Q5ir5nr!HzZ,W4\k5G|QWHw45gQ*tWydTR , Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.95 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33904 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33904 On 24 Dec 2000, Simon Josefsson wrote: > To be consistent with `C-h m' etc, we should probably use `C-c RET' > in documentation, but that would lose the mnemonic. Right. Hm. But the `C-x RET' family of keybindings should also be called `C-x C-m' if we wanted to have mnemonics. For the moment, I think it is better to be consistent. But in the long run, maybe it would be a good idea to convert both `C-x RET' and `C-c RET' to the more mnemonic form. kai -- ~/.signature