Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* C-c C-m or C-c RET?
@ 2000-12-24  0:58 Simon Josefsson
  2000-12-24 14:34 ` Florian Weimer
  2000-12-26 22:50 ` Kai Großjohann
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson @ 2000-12-24  0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)


When updating documentation for the `M-m' -> `C-c C-m' change I
noticed that emacs treat `C-c C-m' as `C-c RET'.

To be consistent with `C-h m' etc, we should probably use `C-c RET' in
documentation, but that would lose the mnemonic.  Should we mention
both (and the mnemonic?), explaining that they are the same?  Sort of
confusing too.  What about `C-c m'?  Hmm.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-26 22:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-24  0:58 C-c C-m or C-c RET? Simon Josefsson
2000-12-24 14:34 ` Florian Weimer
2000-12-26 22:50 ` Kai Großjohann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).