From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33297
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: procmail and split
Date: 10 Nov 2000 10:08:52 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vaf1ywk42jf.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <wtn1ywkut9t.fsf@licia.dtek.chalmers.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169431 24410 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:03:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B686D049A
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 04:09:38 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB26994;
	Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:09:21 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:08:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA21357
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:08:35 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3709D049A
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 04:08:59 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id KAA03540 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:08:58 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id KAA11126; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:08:58 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id KAA23931;
	Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:08:57 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: /B3twq_DELA4]7alR?%xv(/f1N;bi:NN=UlA=(1a"pKte&5/Y/9*z&8q[P}+}YgJX_9*}k_
 0E|EJBC~yEok<#VOw:9GQWq1-;PCR-hd;3|Vk]~"|EM{Q5ir5nr!HzZ,W4\k5G|QWHw45gQ*tWydTR
 ,<Jt~vfW&wP^oKocL*Si?qoJhx];jnpP6K!&D|v#NX-H-EILF/Z|onfJMcsN9
In-Reply-To: <wtn1ywkut9t.fsf@licia.dtek.chalmers.se>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 14
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33297
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33297

On 10 Nov 2000, Jonas Steverud wrote:

> Any good spam-blocking split-rules btw?

I think some people look at the To and Cc headers; if the message
isn't to a mailing list you're on or contains your address in those
headers, it's classified as spam.

Of course, that fails for Bcc'd messages.

kai
-- 
The arms should be held in a natural and unaffected way and never
be conspicuous. -- Revised Technique of Latin American Dancing