From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/42654 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: K v uses eeyes, even though mailcap uses xzgv (Was: OORT.jpg) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:29:17 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <15428.24037.915748.885775@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <871ygc4vgy.fsf@bang.priv.no> <87665n21u3.fsf@bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177867 12989 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:24:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 18952 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2002 17:30:39 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2002 17:30:39 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16Ut84-0006fg-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:30:08 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:30:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02767 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:29:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 18939 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2002 17:29:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18934 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2002 17:29:50 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2002 17:29:50 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g0RHTNb11423; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:29:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id SAA23580; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:29:18 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id CEF063B049; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:29:17 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Steinar Bang In-Reply-To: <87665n21u3.fsf@bang.priv.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:30:44 +0100") Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42654 Steinar Bang writes: > No, the behaviour doesn't seem logical. Is this behaviour mandated by > the mailcap RFC? Is it the practice of other programs using the > mailcap file (eg. Netscape)? Or is it just the MIME library used by > Gnus? I raised this issue some years ago, I think (maybe only some months ago). But I don't remember what was the decision. kai -- ~/.signature is: umop 3p!sdn (Frank Nobis)