From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35332 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus for XEmacs Under Windows Date: 13 Mar 2001 23:17:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171094 2458 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:31:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Russ Allbery , ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19620 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2001 22:17:45 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 19615 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2001 22:17:44 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2001 22:17:44 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id XAA08140; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:17:14 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA10948; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:17:14 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA08069; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:17:14 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: ("Taso N. Devetzis"'s message of "13 Mar 2001 15:33:34 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.99 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35332 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35332 On 13 Mar 2001, Taso N. Devetzis wrote: >> The XEmacs install tree versions aren't ancient. The gnus package >> currently on ftp.xemacs.org in /xemacs/packages is Gnus 5.8.8, the >> latest stable release. > > Really? That's very good -- for some reason I get a version number > of 1.54 when I "list and install" the XEmacs package index. I > figured this was the original (Umeda) GNUS package. I think the XEmacs package 1.54 contains Gnus 5.8.8. Package version != Gnus version. Strange? Yes. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.