From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24029
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Keeping cached (*) mail articles in the backend.  Bad idea?
Date: 09 Jul 1999 10:00:17 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vaf3dyy6yni.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87so702vje.fsf@raven.localnet> <vaf908rwjru.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87k8satiw3.fsf@raven.localnet>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161668 6506 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:54:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA13787
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 04:01:19 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB19565;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:01:13 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 03:02:03 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA05385
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:01:54 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA13782
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 04:00:50 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de (petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with SMTP id KAA04296 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:00:18 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost)
	by petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de id KAA29042; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:00:18 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Rob Browning's message of "09 Jul 1999 01:52:12 -0500"
Original-Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) Emacs/20.3.11
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24029
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24029

Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:

Yes, you need total-expire for using adaptive scoring.  So my
suggestion is not a real help for you.  (I pretty much forgot about
that other discussion, thanks for the reminder.)

> User defined labels sound really nice as long as you can either tell
> Gnus what their expiry behavior should be.

Well, I presume that they would be orthogonal, i.e. you can have a
message which is expirable and labeled `foo', and another message can
be ticked and labeled `foo'.

kai
-- 
Life is hard and then you die.