From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11697 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Article count Date: 17 Jul 1997 19:03:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151362 31881 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:02:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA10346 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:22:37 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA09413 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 14:19:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:04:42 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 14392 invoked by uid 504); 17 Jul 1997 17:03:53 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14389 invoked from network); 17 Jul 1997 17:03:52 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 1997 17:03:52 -0000 Original-Received: from petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id TAA24778; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:03:50 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id TAA18085; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:03:50 +0200 Original-To: dsg@mitre.org (David S. Goldberg) In-Reply-To: dsg@linus.mitre.org's message of "17 Jul 1997 12:27:58 -0400" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.63/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 31 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:2087 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11697 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11697 >>>>> David S Goldberg writes: Kai> Btw, I also wanted to make Gnus automatically hide the articles Kai> that I've read but want to keep. Therefore I switched from Kai> total-expire to auto-expire and I'm happy now because entering Kai> a (mail) group is usually a lot faster now -- fewer articles to Kai> display. One can still use dormant articles for nntp groups... David> Why does this make any difference? Either way read articles David> are not displayed for me. If total-expire is on, articles marked as read are expirable. I'm unsure about the difference between (1) turning on total-expire then marking articles as "!" or "?" depending on whether they should be hidden or displayed, and (2) using auto-expire or explicitly marking articles as expirable and marking articles "!" or "r" depending on whether they should be hidden or displayed. Can anybody shed some light on that? I suspect that M-x gnus-group-expire-all-groups RET is faster in case (1). But what else is different? kai -- A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)