From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4878 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: M-g and nnmail-spool-file Date: 24 Jan 1996 14:37:26 +0100 Organization: Universitaet Dortmund, CS Dept, Chair 6 Sender: grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145563 31159 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:26:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA04556 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:03:47 -0800 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 14:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.6.11/UniDo 2.0.44) id OAA11989; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 14:37:30 +0100 Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA23357; Wed, 24 Jan 96 14:37:29 +0100 Original-To: Steven L Baur In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 22 Jan 1996 14:40:59 -0800 Original-Lines: 35 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4878 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4878 >>>>> "Kai" =3D=3D Kai Grossjohann >>>>> writes: Kai> I use sgnus-0.29 on Emacs 19.30. When I enter a group and do a Kai> M-g from the Summary buffer, mail is read from the files in Kai> nnmail-spool-file and added to the current group. I would Kai> expect nnmail-spool-file not to be read at all, but if it is Kai> read, I would expect the mail to go to mail.misc (or somewhere Kai> else, according to nnmail-split-methods). >>>>> On 22 Jan 1996 14:40:59 -0800, Steven L Baur >>>>> said: Steven> The only way to get messages from alt.security.pgp.spool to Steven> go into nnml:alt.security.pgp.spool is to M-g on the group Steven> name. I don't think this has anything to do with the misbehavior I talked about. You're talking about the procmail spool files, I'm talking about the nnmail-spool-file variable. To clarify: I have a setup that puts all my mail from /var/spool/mail/grossjoh into nnml:mail.misc (because nnmail-split-methods is `(("mail.misc" ""))'). Suppose there is a mail in /var/spool/mail/grossjoh and I am in the nnml:foo summary buffer. I then hit M-g which causes this mail from /var/spool/mail/grossjoh to be put in the nnml:foo group. I would expect mail from ~/procmail-spool-dir/foo.suffix to be put in the group (and, indeed, they are), but I would NOT expect those from /var/spool/mail/grossjoh to be put there. After all, nnmail-split-methods says to put these in nnml:mail.misc! I hope I have clarified my message. Did I misunderstand yours? kai -- Life is hard and then you die.