From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36198
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: letting split rules have access to the message body...
Date: 12 May 2001 00:50:56 +0200
Message-ID: <vaf4rurzei7.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87pudg99j9.fsf@mclinux.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171825 7281 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:43:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:43:45 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 17744 invoked by alias); 11 May 2001 22:51:24 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 17739 invoked from network); 11 May 2001 22:51:24 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 11 May 2001 22:51:24 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id AAA01563 for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 12 May 2001 00:50:57 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id AAA17531; Sat, 12 May 2001 00:50:56 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA25258;
	Sat, 12 May 2001 00:50:56 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <87pudg99j9.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "10 May 2001 17:30:34 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36198
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36198

On 10 May 2001, Josh Huber wrote:

> This was brought up a week or two ago, and people (Kai?) just said,
> well...why don't you just do:
> 
> (save-restriction
>     (widen)
>     ...
>     )

Stupid me.  There should be a save-excursion and a switch to
gnus-original-article-buffer in there, I think.

kai
-- 
The passive voice should never be used.