From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5427 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Red gnus feature request - user defined marks. Date: 04 Mar 1996 12:21:14 +0100 Organization: Universitaet Dortmund, CS Dept, Chair 6 Sender: grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: <199602271703.TAA19920@mangal.cs.huji.ac.il> Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.41) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146031 32761 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:33:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA16672 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 04:21:18 -0800 Original-Received: from floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.40]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:21:23 +0100 Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de by floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.7.3/UniDo 3.7) id MAA09731; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:21:17 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA11987; Mon, 4 Mar 96 12:21:16 +0100 Original-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk (Per Abrahamsen) In-Reply-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk's message of 01 Mar 1996 23:24:15 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5427 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5427 >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> Well, nnbabyl could alter the group info to heed labels like LMI> answered and read, I guess. LMI> What I was thinking of was a more general annotation LMI> functionality. The user taps some key, enters a random string LMI> -- "I've really got to think hard on this one", and this LMI> annotation will then be presented in some way associated with LMI> the message itself. I propose that we have labels first. Annotations can be somewhat imitated by editing the message, can't they? Or, maybe we would like to implement annotations by editing the message? And automatically add a label? Using a header X-Annotated which contains the annotation? kai -- ~/.signature