From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36278
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules...
Date: 18 May 2001 21:16:56 +0200
Message-ID: <vaf66eycvrr.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vafg0e2iql6.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com>
	<vafvgmyh9yc.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171890 7728 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:50 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 24932 invoked by alias); 18 May 2001 19:17:24 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 24927 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 19:17:24 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 May 2001 19:17:24 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id VAA18184 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:16:57 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id VAA08033; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:16:56 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id VAA32118;
	Fri, 18 May 2001 21:16:56 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "18 May 2001 14:58:25 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 19
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36278
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36278

On 18 May 2001, Josh Huber wrote:

> Right, it would make sense to me that the
> gnus-original-article-buffer variable should be updated during
> splitting, and set back to the previous value after splitting is
> done.
> 
> how does that sound?

I think that's not the right buffer, for gnus-original-article-buffer
is used when _displaying_ a message, not during splitting.  That is,
if you look at the *Article* buffer then you see a munged copy of the
contents of the original article buffer.

Maybe introduce a new variable nnmail-original-message-buffer?

kai
-- 
~/.signature: No such file or directory