Re: MML menu in message-mode is poorly named

[Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)]

Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> > Andreas Fuchs <asf@void.at> writes:
>> 
>>> Hmm, my favorite would be `Multi-Part', but that might be too long
>>> for a single menu entry.
>> 
>> I think what might be confusing to a user is that the user does not
>> expect encryption/signing and attachment to be in the same menu.  For
>> the encryption/signing part we might have a menu title of
>> "Encrypt/sign".  
>
> Silly as it may sound, "Security"? This is what the user probably wants
> to do, or to deal with, when they are going to use PGP and friends...
>
>> For the MIME multipart stuff we might have a menu title of
>> "Attachments".
>
> That's a good name. IMO, of course.

Okay.  So if the MML menu was split into two menus, we'd know that the
two menus should be named "Security" and "Attachments".

Should the MML menu be split into two?

kai
-- 
~/.signature: No such file or directory