From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37747 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MML menu in message-mode is poorly named Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vgjs7p6x.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173108 15455 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:05:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 18761 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 11:07:27 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 11:07:27 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id NAA00312; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:06:55 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id NAA15083; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:06:54 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id NAA02734; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:06:54 +0200 Original-To: Daniel Pittman In-Reply-To: <87vgjs7p6x.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> (Daniel Pittman's message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:56:22 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37747 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37747 Daniel Pittman writes: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Kai Gro=DFjohann wrote: > > Andreas Fuchs writes: >>=20 >>> Hmm, my favorite would be `Multi-Part', but that might be too long >>> for a single menu entry. >>=20 >> I think what might be confusing to a user is that the user does not >> expect encryption/signing and attachment to be in the same menu. For >> the encryption/signing part we might have a menu title of >> "Encrypt/sign".=20=20 > > Silly as it may sound, "Security"? This is what the user probably wants > to do, or to deal with, when they are going to use PGP and friends... > >> For the MIME multipart stuff we might have a menu title of >> "Attachments". > > That's a good name. IMO, of course. Okay. So if the MML menu was split into two menus, we'd know that the two menus should be named "Security" and "Attachments". Should the MML menu be split into two? kai --=20 ~/.signature: No such file or directory