From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24035
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Keeping cached (*) mail articles in the backend.  Bad idea?
Date: 09 Jul 1999 16:22:05 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vaf7lo9c38y.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87so702vje.fsf@raven.localnet> <vaf908rwjru.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87k8satiw3.fsf@raven.localnet> <vaf3dyy6yni.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <oqu2rerox7.fsf@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161673 6529 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:54:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA18306
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB20479;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:24:29 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 09:24:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11404
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:23:47 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA18273
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:22:41 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de (petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with SMTP id QAA12811; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:22:06 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost)
	by petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de id QAA29695; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:22:05 +0200
Original-To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard's message of "09 Jul 1999 08:24:52 -0400"
Original-Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) Emacs/20.3.11
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24035
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24035

François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> But I do not remember that there is a relation with total expiry.
> How comes?

Without total-expire, all expirable articles are marked E.  With
total-expire, catching up marks articles with gnus-catchup-mark.
Adaptive scoring needs the difference to work.

I think.

kai
-- 
Life is hard and then you die.