From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24028
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnmh, delete next last article (Was: Re: Can't select group created by copying)
Date: 09 Jul 1999 09:54:58 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vaf7loa6ywd.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87r9mkvjg9.fsf@parus.itea.ntnu.no> <wtnzp18a9wb.fsf@licia.dtek.chalmers.se> <vafbtdozhic.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <wtnr9mkph6s.fsf_-_@licia.dtek.chalmers.se> <vafr9mjwkgj.fsf@petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m31zejrlil.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161667 6498 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:54:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:54:27 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13764
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB19546;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 02:56:15 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 02:56:44 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA05295
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 02:56:35 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13718
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:55:33 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de (petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with SMTP id JAA04194 for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:55:00 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost)
	by petty.cs.uni-dortmund.de id JAA29015; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:54:59 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "08 Jul 1999 15:26:10 -0400"
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) Emacs/20.3.11
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24028
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24028

Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

> * Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE  on Thu, 08 Jul 1999
> | Oh.  Strange.  Hm.  Bug in pgnus?
> 
> Well, if you use nnml/nnmh, Gnus will generally not delete the last message
> just in case you happen to be using procmail.  It sounds like the variable
> (or whatever) that tells Gnus what the last message number might be is not
> being updated.

That's what I thought, too, but the original poster explained that
it's the _next to last_ msg which isn't deleted, rather than the
_last_ one.

kai
-- 
Life is hard and then you die.