From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38392 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap: Checking mailbox foo Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:20:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174263 22176 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 7368 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 08:20:28 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 08:20:28 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id KAA24057 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:20:01 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id KAA26203; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:20:01 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id D8056206B; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:20:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:43:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 13 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38392 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38392 Simon Josefsson writes: > It might be possible to collect this information in the background. > Or altering the way Gnus looks for unread mail to make things faster. This sounds as if the IMAP protocol could deliver useful information faster, but Gnus doesn't know what to do with it. What could be the data that IMAP can deliver faster? kai -- Symbol's function definition is void: signature