From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Subject: nnml is diverging from other backends
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:31:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafae0xi8ba.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
I notice that nnml is diverging from the other nnmail-derived backends
right now. Maybe too few people care about the other backends... Do
you think we should just let it slide, or should the new functionality
from nnml be copied to the other backends, too?
I kinda get the feeling that we're sitting on a gun powder box, here.
(What's the English idiom for this?)
kai
--
Symbol's function definition is void: signature
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-18 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-18 17:31 Kai Großjohann [this message]
2001-08-18 19:11 ` Jody Klymak
2001-08-18 19:45 ` Harry Putnam
2001-08-18 19:29 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vafae0xi8ba.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).