From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37986 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnml is diverging from other backends Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:31:21 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173640 18389 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:14:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 28976 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2001 17:31:49 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2001 17:31:49 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id TAA11685 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:31:22 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id TAA02169; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:31:21 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id 55D3A201D; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:31:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37986 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37986 I notice that nnml is diverging from the other nnmail-derived backends right now. Maybe too few people care about the other backends... Do you think we should just let it slide, or should the new functionality from nnml be copied to the other backends, too? I kinda get the feeling that we're sitting on a gun powder box, here. (What's the English idiom for this?) kai -- Symbol's function definition is void: signature