From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37290 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Please test tentative change: annotations in nnml groups Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:34:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172730 13090 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:58:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 9025 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2001 22:34:51 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2001 22:34:51 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id AAA18073 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:34:23 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id AAA01144; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:34:23 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA11319; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:34:23 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:25:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 28 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37290 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37290 On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Paul Jarc wrote: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: >> * The implementation seems to be nearly independent of the backend. >> Some code reuse seems to be in order. >=20 > I see it's been moved to nnmail-do-request-post. But it doesn't > seem to be dependent on nnmail; maybe nnheader would be a better > place for it? nnmaildir, for example, is not derived from nnmail, > but could still use this, I think. Hm. Hmmm. It seems that the functions in nnheader.el are all of a lower level. Hm. And then there is nnoo.el, but that also seems to be the wrong file. Do we want to create a new file with functions to be used by the backends? But then, nnheader.el already has functions that are used by the backends. But none of the nnheader functions call any gnus functions. Since nnmail-do-request-post calls gnus functions, maybe it should be put in a gnus*.el file? Lessee. [time passes] No, I couldn't find a better file. Other opinions? kai --=20 ~/.signature: No such file or directory