From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36403
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sender header?
Date: 25 May 2001 11:37:04 +0200
Message-ID: <vafae41rcqn.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vafg0dwrpyh.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vaf3d9uq4c4.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vafsnhuk8t2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m3r8xeh8qw.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m2k836a3s6.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk>
	<01May24.171325edt.115217@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m3u22afnfm.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <m3n1822pvx.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
	<hv1ypexiwb.fsf@spip.ws.nextra.no> <m3itiq5arb.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171993 8391 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "(ding)" <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 9981 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 09:37:33 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 9976 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 09:37:33 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 09:37:33 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id LAA12937; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:37:05 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA12231; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:37:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA05590;
	Fri, 25 May 2001 11:37:04 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3itiq5arb.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> (Stainless Steel Rat's message of "25 May 2001 00:10:48 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36403
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36403

On 25 May 2001, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:

> * "Bj=F8rn Mork" <bmork@dod.no>  on Thu, 24 May 2001
>| RFC 1912 recommends adding MX records even for hosts which are not
>| supposed to send or receive mail, but I don't think that justifies
>| ignoring those who don't.
>=20
> In what way is this different from "all A records should have
> associated MX records"?

It's the difference between a recommendation and a requirement.

kai
--=20
~/.signature: No such file or directory