From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32996
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: confused w.r.t. branches
Date: 28 Oct 2000 14:20:58 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafaebpkvh1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169183 22818 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:59:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:59:43 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AECD049A
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB12614;
	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 07:21:24 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 28 Oct 2000 07:20:45 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA26581
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 07:20:35 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3852D049A
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:21:00 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id OAA00733 for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:20:59 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id OAA07783; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:20:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA04758;
	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:20:58 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: /B3twq_DELA4]7alR?%xv(/f1N;bi:NN=UlA=(1a"pKte&5/Y/9*z&8q[P}+}YgJX_9*}k_
 0E|EJBC~yEok<#VOw:9GQWq1-;PCR-hd;3|Vk]~"|EM{Q5ir5nr!HzZ,W4\k5G|QWHw45gQ*tWydTR
 ,<Jt~vfW&wP^oKocL*Si?qoJhx];jnpP6K!&D|v#NX-H-EILF/Z|onfJMcsN9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 16
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32996
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32996

I have just committed a change in gnus.texi to the HEAD branch, but
I'm confused as to whether this was the right thing to do.

Is the HEAD branch ognus now?

As this was a doc change, users of 5.8 (and 5.9) might also benefit
from it (unless the change was bogus, that is).

What should I do?  I take it that Dave is taking care of 5.9 and
merges in stuff as appropriate?  So I only need to worry about 5.8 and
ognus?  Which changes should go where?  I presume that 5.8 commits
should also be committed to ognus, but not vice versa.

kai
-- 
I like BOTH kinds of music.