From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32358
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Weird subject wrapping
Date: 08 Sep 2000 17:37:17 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafaediq4ia.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <87u2brbyo4.fsf@senstation.vvf.fi>
	<vaf4s3rmcsv.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3bsxzt00o.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168641 19276 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:50:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:50:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89806D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2000 11:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAC07399;
	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 10:38:29 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 08 Sep 2000 10:37:47 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07221
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 10:37:37 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BA1D051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri,  8 Sep 2000 11:37:53 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id RAA19175; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 17:37:18 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA13831; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 17:37:17 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA20693;
	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 17:37:17 +0200
Original-To: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
In-Reply-To: prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "08 Sep 2000 10:45:37 -0400"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 28
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32358
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32358

On 08 Sep 2000, Paul Jarc wrote:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) writes:
>> I think that MUAs are supposed to remove the leading whitespace
>> from continuation lines.  Or are they supposed to replace that with
>> a single space?  I'm not sure.
> 
> RFC822 (3.1.1) says: "Unfolding is accomplished by regarding CRLF
> immediately followed by a LWSP-char as equivalent to the LWSP-char."

Ick!  Having the following in a message header looks really awful:

Subject: this is a long
 subject continued on the next line

I'd prefer something like

Subject: this is a long
         subject continued on the next line

But I can't use that with the RFC :-|

Darn.

kai
-- 
I like BOTH kinds of music.