* 0.28 and gnus-article-hide-boring-headers
@ 1996-01-17 8:59 Kai Grossjohann
1996-01-17 12:27 ` Kai Grossjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kai Grossjohann @ 1996-01-17 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi all,
in gnus.el, at line 13133 in function
gnus-article-hide-boring-headers, I changed the code to read thusly:
((eq elem 'reply-to)
;;- Kai added stringp tests here
(when (and (stringp (mail-fetch-field "from"))
(stringp (mail-fetch-field "reply-to"))
(equal (nth 1 (mail-extract-address-components
(mail-fetch-field "from")))
(nth 1 (mail-extract-address-components
(mail-fetch-field "reply-to")))))
(gnus-article-hide-header "reply-to")))
I added the two stringp tests. Was this the right thing to do? What
should I have done instead?
The symptom was that mail-extract-address-components got called with a
nil argument which it didn't like at all.
kai
--
I like both kinds of music.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: 0.28 and gnus-article-hide-boring-headers
1996-01-17 8:59 0.28 and gnus-article-hide-boring-headers Kai Grossjohann
@ 1996-01-17 12:27 ` Kai Grossjohann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kai Grossjohann @ 1996-01-17 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 96 09:59:53 +0100, Kai Grossjohann
>>>>> <grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> said:
Kai> Hi all, in gnus.el, at line 13133 in function
Kai> gnus-article-hide-boring-headers, I changed the code to read
Kai> thusly: [...]
Not only did I put the wrong version number into the subject (should
have been 0.27, of course); even worse: I mailed this twice. Please
excuse me for that, but 0.27 seemed to think the mail hadn't been sent
yet.
kai
--
I like both kinds of music.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* 0.28 and gnus-article-hide-boring-headers
@ 1996-01-17 8:59 Kai Grossjohann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kai Grossjohann @ 1996-01-17 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi all,
in gnus.el, at line 13133 in function
gnus-article-hide-boring-headers, I changed the code to read thusly:
((eq elem 'reply-to)
;;- Kai added stringp tests here
(when (and (stringp (mail-fetch-field "from"))
(stringp (mail-fetch-field "reply-to"))
(equal (nth 1 (mail-extract-address-components
(mail-fetch-field "from")))
(nth 1 (mail-extract-address-components
(mail-fetch-field "reply-to")))))
(gnus-article-hide-header "reply-to")))
I added the two stringp tests. Was this the right thing to do? What
should I have done instead?
The symptom was that mail-extract-address-components got called with a
nil argument which it didn't like at all.
kai
--
I like both kinds of music.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-01-17 12:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-01-17 8:59 0.28 and gnus-article-hide-boring-headers Kai Grossjohann
1996-01-17 12:27 ` Kai Grossjohann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-01-17 8:59 Kai Grossjohann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).