From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39287
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: annotations via Gcc
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:20:14 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafbsj8m1xd.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <m3u1x17yho.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175018 27062 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:36:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:36:58 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 15966 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 08:23:35 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 08:23:35 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 15tPTE-0005lT-00; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:21:04 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:20:41 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA25076
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:20:31 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 13903 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2001 08:20:48 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 13893 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2001 08:20:47 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2001 08:20:47 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id f9G8KKq01045
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:20:20 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id KAA10943; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:20:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id BF2CC203B; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:20:14 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3u1x17yho.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message
 of "Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:45:33 -0400")
Original-Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39287
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39287

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> I think Kai's annotations via nnchoke-request-post could also be done
> via Gcc, if messages were only required to have at least one of
> mail recipients, Newsgroups:, or Gcc.

Hm.  Of course, you're right.  It seemed to me that it is cleaner to
use the Newsgroups header, but I wasn't sure why.  Of course, the fact
that Gnus complains about missing To/Cc/Newsgroups headers is not a
real reason.  Hm.

Thoughts?  Should I revert the Newsgroups patch from nnml?

But on the other hand, adding Newsgroups support to all backends is
really simple and can be done in cookbook style.

kai
-- 
Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'?