From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37659
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: archiving oddness
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 23:57:18 +0200
Message-ID: <vafbslo99s1.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <m3lmktb2tj.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<vafelql40lu.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3bslpb0cn.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173033 14987 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:03:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:03:53 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <grossjoh@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 27765 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2001 21:57:46 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2001 21:57:46 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id XAA04049 for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:57:19 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id XAA25168; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:57:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA04811;
	Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:57:18 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3bslpb0cn.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> (prj@po.cwru.edu's message
 of "Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:37:38 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37659
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37659

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:
> > prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
>>> This doesn't (do I need to restart Gnus?):
>>> (setq gnus-message-archive-method nil) ; Is this wrong?
>>> (setq gnus-message-archive-group "nnmaildir:sent")
> ...
> > I have gnus-message-archive-group set to "nnimap:INBOX" but leave
>> gnus-message-archive-method at the default value.  That works.
>
> I wonder if this should be changed.  If g-m-a-m is so troublesome,
> then maybe people should be able to use g-m-a-g without creating a new
> server.  Or maybe not - maybe this is why g-o-m-g isn't going away.

I would prefer gnus-message-archive-method to be allowed to be nil.

kai
--=20
~/.signature: No such file or directory