From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35325 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Incoming695xtd and other such files Date: 12 Mar 2001 21:30:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lmqcngaa.fsf@harpo.homeip.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171088 2419 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:31:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 22086 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2001 20:31:27 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22081 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 20:31:26 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 20:31:26 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id VAA07275; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:30:57 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id VAA03922; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:30:57 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id VAA04091; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:30:57 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: <87lmqcngaa.fsf@harpo.homeip.net> (Samuel Padgett's message of "11 Mar 2001 16:31:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.99 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35325 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35325 On 11 Mar 2001, Samuel Padgett wrote: > Actually, I believe he's running Oort Gnus, in which case the > variable should be nil. Perhaps it's best not to change it when > running a development version? 00ps. Of course. Silly me. Safety nets are a Good Thing for users of development versions. Beware of Oorts eating your mail for lunch :-) (Not that this ever happened to me.) kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.