From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11843 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus and qmail maildir format Date: 05 Aug 1997 19:22:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151488 340 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:04:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, Russ Allbery Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA11702 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 10:59:12 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA15698 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:54:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 19:23:05 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 31727 invoked by uid 504); 5 Aug 1997 17:23:04 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 31724 invoked from network); 5 Aug 1997 17:23:03 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 1997 17:23:03 -0000 Original-Received: from petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id TAA11092; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 19:22:58 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id TAA02220; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 19:22:57 +0200 Original-To: Jason R Mastaler In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "05 Aug 1997 10:31:59 -0600" Original-Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11843 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11843 >>>>> On 05 Aug 1997, Jason R Mastaler said: Jason> [...] I'm not sure whether support for Maildir is built into Jason> Gnus yet, but I would guess no based on what I've read. [...] If I understand correctly, the difference perceived by a user is that qmail does not write mbox style files but instead writes one file per message in a directory. If nnmail-spool-file is a directory, all files in that directory are considered to be spool files. I'm not sure if that's what you call support for qmail. kai -- Signature? What signature?