From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10274 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Should archive server add Message-IDs to the cache? Date: 18 Mar 1997 19:02:54 +0100 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150172 23451 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA18191 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:21:03 -0800 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:02:58 +0100 Original-Received: from naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.111]) by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id TAA12511 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:02:56 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id TAA14251; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:02:55 +0100 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 18 Mar 1997 09:27:52 -0800 Original-Lines: 28 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.28/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10274 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10274 >>>>> David Moore writes: David> I don't think things in the Gcc line should be adding David> Message-IDs to the cache. Especially not for my real archive David> groups. It makes duplicate detection fairly useless for how David> I sometimes arrange things. >>>>> Kai Grossjohann writes: Kai> Only for those groups, I think. I always Gcc into the group I Kai> post from which makes duplicate deletion a nice thing to have. David> No, it's global. And it has to be, since it has to know David> about the duplication before it's decided what group the David> message belongs in, since you want to be able to use the David> `Gnus-Warning: duplicate message...' header when filing your David> mail. So there seems to be a conflict. Some people use archive groups, like you, and would like one behavior. Other people don't use archive groups (like me) and would like the other behavior. But I guess this could be made an option, couldn't it? kai -- A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)