From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38812
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:49:52 +0200
Message-ID: <vafd74o2xtr.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <muxitehykyq.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174617 24500 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 14556 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 17:52:10 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 17:52:10 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
	by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8IHnwU19665
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:49:58 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id TAA22044; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:49:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id E7A9B20B0; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:49:52 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Gnus Beta Testers <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: <muxitehykyq.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr> (Didier Verna's message of
 "Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:02:05 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38812
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38812

Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr> writes:

>        In the good ol'days, I used to start all my paragraphs with a
> simple TAB, including paragraphs answering to quotations. Now,
> here's what it gives me. This is stupid. I hate that.

Hm.  I thought that indent-relative was the best thing since sliced
bread...

Anyway, M-i should do what you want.  If you don't use the completion
functionality of message-tab, you can also just rebind the TAB key.
If you do use the completion functionality, you could modify the
source.

If enough people want your behavior, maybe a user option could be
introduced.

kai
-- 
Symbol's function definition is void: signature