From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36288 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 21 May 2001 16:30:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171898 7781 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 10209 invoked by alias); 21 May 2001 14:30:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 10204 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 14:30:37 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 May 2001 14:30:37 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id QAA04498 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:30:08 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id QAA12536; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:30:08 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id QAA04886; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:30:08 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} (Josh Huber's message of "21 May 2001 10:08:59 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36288 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36288 On 21 May 2001, Josh Huber wrote: > It doesn't happen. I put a (debug) inside my fancy split function, > and checked out the values of the variables and what buffers > existed. gnus-original-article-buffer definitely points to < > *Original Article*> and said buffer contains the message being > re-spooled. > > Should it copy the message into nnmail-incoming-buffer beforehand? Or maybe it could bind the variable nnmail-incoming-buffer to the right value, instead. But it should do at least one of the two. kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory