From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35308 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Thoughts on Message-ID generation Date: 11 Mar 2001 16:09:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87n1b6rcq9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87snkxqico.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87hf101j5o.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171073 2316 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:31:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 7085 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2001 15:11:07 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 7080 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2001 15:11:07 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2001 15:11:07 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id QAA07275; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:10:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id QAA01551; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:10:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id QAA17155; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:10:23 +0100 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: <87hf101j5o.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "11 Mar 2001 15:20:51 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.99 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35308 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35308 On 11 Mar 2001, Florian Weimer wrote: > But message IDs are *not unique* for mail messages. As soon as you > crosspost a message to two mailing lists, there are at least two > copies of the same message being distributed with different headers. Then every news message violates the uniqueness constraint, too. Every news server which sees the message frobs the Path header. And if you send a mail message to two people, the Received headers will be different. Clearly, the Path and Received headers should not be considered important when comparing two messages. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.