From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5620 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-reply-to-function for replying to everybody Date: 20 Mar 1996 09:53:32 +0100 Organization: Universitaet Dortmund, CS Dept, Chair 6 Sender: grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: <6722.827292785@ibcinc.com> <19667.827299860@ibcinc.com> Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.41) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146198 861 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:36:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: khan@cs.purdue.edu (Muhammad Farrukh Khan), ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA06454 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 01:33:14 -0800 Original-Received: from floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.40]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:53:49 +0100 Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA19619; Wed, 20 Mar 96 09:53:34 +0100 Original-To: Roderick Schertler In-Reply-To: Roderick Schertler's message of Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:31:00 -0500 Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5620 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5620 >>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:31:00 -0500, Roderick Schertler >>>>> said: Roderick> This isn't appropriate in the general case. I gateway Roderick> mailing lists into actual local newsgroups (rather than Roderick> reading mail groups in ding) so that other local users can Roderick> read them, and maintaining my own to-address group Roderick> parameter or the like seems silly when the proper address Roderick> is already right there in the To or Cc header. Well, this is a special case. `F' works just fine for `real' news postings and for `real' mail messages, but for news postings that are really mail messages, you will of course see some strange behavior. I suggest actually setting to-list (or was it to-address?) so that follow-ups are not posted to the news group. Or you could just ignore the problem and post the follow-ups to the newsgroup as well as sending them by mail to all recipients. (The latter will be done in all cases.) kai -- ~/.signature