From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36780 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Dormant and ticked not independent in nnimap? Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 12:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172310 10413 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:51:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 15927 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 10:13:31 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 10:13:31 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id MAA28760 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:13:04 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id MAA20199; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:13:03 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id MAA07387; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:13:03 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 04 Jul 2001 11:32:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36780 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36780 On Wed, 04 Jul 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Yes, uhm, nnimap translates "dormant" into \Flagged + gnus-dormant. > This is so the article "stand out" when you're using some other IMAP > client. > > The flag is added at line ~943, and removed internally at line ~910. > It should be easy to comment this two parts out. Maybe I should > make this conditional, so you can disable this behaviour? If you would do that, that would be wonderful. > Btw, very interesting idea! This is a nice way to get user-specific > flags without server support for the idea. It might even be > possible to extend to all flag (i.e. different set of Read-flags for > different users). Could be. Never thought about that. Might be useful in some circumstances. >> Is there anything I can do about this? Or do I have to wait for >> Cyrus 2.x to get per-user article marks? > > I'm not sure if even Cyrus 2.x helps. \Read and maybe some other > are user-specific, but I don't think \Flagged etc are. But I maybe > wrong. Well, \Read is user-specific even in the old 1.6.x. Since I don't really have 2.x yet, I'm not _sure_ which ones will be user-specific then. kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory