From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36462
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sender header?
Date: 27 May 2001 00:24:24 +0200
Message-ID: <vafeltbzr3b.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m33d9uh3ri.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<01May24.172056edt.115272@gateway.intersys.com>
	<m366eqe3ot.fsf@ecube.local> <ylitiqruq3.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<m31ype59yk.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
	<vafr8xdrdcl.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May25.160117edt.115218@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vaf3d9t3xlt.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3eltcad44.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172042 8738 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:47:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:47:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "(ding)" <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 5674 invoked by alias); 26 May 2001 22:24:54 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 5669 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 22:24:54 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 May 2001 22:24:54 -0000
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id AAA12148; Sun, 27 May 2001 00:24:25 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id AAA10420; Sun, 27 May 2001 00:24:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA24595;
	Sun, 27 May 2001 00:24:24 +0200
X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>!
 $n%@SHJ](K<taDos\M;zw#b7gIc01F@'f{.guD~];wV{#\SX0YlGR6fREpYY>FJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$
 ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>}<oCe5vw:p#\Gsv#E(:`3Jl2*()0,/H
Original-To: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3eltcad44.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> (Stainless Steel Rat's message of "26 May 2001 01:33:15 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 24
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36462
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36462

On 26 May 2001, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:

> * Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) on Fri, 25 May
>   2001
>=20
>| How about having Gnus check the message before sending, and if the
>| user has manually entered a From header, have Gnus tell the user to
>| add a Sender header, too?
>=20
> Of course, if we have a hundred people asking how to turn off Sender
> now, Gnus goes and does that and we will have three hundred asking
> how to turn off this new behaviour.  It is difficult to call that an
> improvement. :)

He he.  However, this depends on how you define `manually entered'.
One possibility would be to say that a From header which comes from
user-mail-address is _not_ manually entered.  Only if the header is
_really_ manually entered, should we ask.

How many people do M-<, then type `From: SPC bla RET'?

kai
--=20
~/.signature: No such file or directory