From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12026 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: cache behavior question Date: 12 Sep 1997 09:11:24 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151637 1499 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:07:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA02966 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 01:09:38 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA11419 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 03:06:35 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:11:31 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32233 invoked by uid 504); 12 Sep 1997 07:11:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 32230 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1997 07:11:29 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 1997 07:11:29 -0000 Original-Received: from petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.161]) by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id JAA12396 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:11:27 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by petty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id JAA00587; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:11:25 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.66/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12026 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12026 Hi, In ``(gnus)Article Cache'' I read the following. ,----- | The entering/removal of articles from the cache is controlled by the | `gnus-cache-enter-articles' and `gnus-cache-remove-articles' variables. | Both are lists of symbols. The first is `(ticked dormant)' by | default, meaning that ticked and dormant articles will be put in the | cache. The latter is `(read)' by default, meaning that articles marked | as read are removed from the cache. Possibly symbols in these two | lists are `ticked', `dormant', `unread' and `read'. `----- I have bound the "d" key to be gnus-summary-mark-as-expirable in all groups. Does this mean that ticked articles that are in the cache will not be removed from the cache when I hit "d"? I always thought rebinding the "d" key like this wasn't dangerous... The word "expirable" does not occur in the last sentence I cited above, so I'm a bit confused. kai -- I like both kinds of music.