From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37665 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Wrong default indents in message.el Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:16:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2n3d71t8ue.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> <87g0b0z88f.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173038 15016 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:03:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12961 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 13:17:08 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2001 13:17:08 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id PAA17275; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:16:35 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id PAA12662; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:16:34 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id PAA01400; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:16:34 +0200 Original-To: Daniel Pittman In-Reply-To: <87g0b0z88f.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> (Daniel Pittman's message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:26:08 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 20 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37665 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37665 Daniel Pittman writes: > Out of curiosity, does message-x do much that frobbing > `message-completion-alist' wouldn't? > > For me, since that alist contains a binding to complete from BBDB by > default, I am a happy boy... Hm. Oh. It seems the functionality was added to message, then :-) Now we might wish to see whether we need smarter completion functions. I tried to wrote some, but maybe I failed. message-x wants to call message-position-point if completion was, err, complete. Actually, it looks to see if the buffer has changed or point has moved, and that doesn't work too well. kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory