From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38916
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:22:47 +0200
Message-ID: <vafhetrefig.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <muxitehykyq.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
	<vafd74o2xtr.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<shlmjato84.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
	<vaf1yl2p59p.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<muxg09cdh7p.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174707 25101 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:31:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:31:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Gnus Beta Testers <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 2115 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2001 10:23:20 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2001 10:23:20 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
	by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8PAMqU02033;
	Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:22:52 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id MAA02780; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:22:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 47E6720B3; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:22:47 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <muxg09cdh7p.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr> (Didier Verna's message of
 "Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:19:06 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38916
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38916

Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr> writes:

> Having yet another variable is overkill to me[1], but I don't mind,
> as long as the default is switched back to tab-to-tab-stop. Plain
> TAB, that's all. That's what people have been getting for *years*.

It's not overkill.  I want indent-relative!

Therefore, a variable is clearly the way to go.  Then everybody can
have their preferred behavior.

kai
-- 
Symbol's function definition is void: signature