From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36284 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 19 May 2001 13:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171895 7748 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 6499 invoked by alias); 19 May 2001 11:21:16 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 6494 invoked from network); 19 May 2001 11:21:16 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 May 2001 11:21:16 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id NAA27766 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:49 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id NAA28304; Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:48 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id NAA06446; Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:48 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} (Simon Josefsson's message of "19 May 2001 10:58:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36284 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36284 On 19 May 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hm, how is this a problem? Doesn't nnmail copy the article into > nnmail-incoming-buffer before processing it, even when respooling? If this would happen, that would be good enough, I guess. Then, split rules wishing to access the message body can look in nnmail-incoming-buffer. Josh? kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory