From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10767 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: auto-expire and disappearing "expirable" mark? Date: 22 Apr 1997 09:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150582 26270 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA16331 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 03:45:26 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 12:27:05 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5999 invoked by uid 504); 22 Apr 1997 07:38:04 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5996 invoked from network); 22 Apr 1997 07:38:04 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 1997 07:38:03 -0000 Original-Received: from naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.111]) by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id JAA17459 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:40:12 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by naunet.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id JAA13533; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:40:12 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10767 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10767 I vaguely remember there being a problem with articles marked as expirable to have that mark be removed when followups appear in the group. But this must've been more than a year ago. Was there ever such a problem? Is there still such a problem? Considering to switch from total-expire to auto-expire... kai -- because I couldn't think of a good beginning.