From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45016
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai
 =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: The followup will show the bug.
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:38:13 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafit571k0q.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <vaf7klt5ygj.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<v9u1ox6wzb.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
	<vafg00gta5t.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m38z65mpz2.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<vafbsb04cx7.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<vaf66184cw2.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3adqkut45.fsf@defun.localdomain>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022658350 24408 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 07:45:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 07:45:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Cy9W-0006LX-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Wed, 29 May 2002 09:45:50 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17Cy3V-0002IA-00; Wed, 29 May 2002 02:39:37 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 29 May 2002 02:39:53 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA16934
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 29 May 2002 02:39:40 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 14190 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 07:39:18 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 14184 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 07:39:18 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 May 2002 07:39:18 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id g4T7cJb09102;
	Wed, 29 May 2002 09:38:19 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id JAA27782; Wed, 29 May 2002 09:38:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 7DE583B41C; Wed, 29 May 2002 09:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk>
In-Reply-To: <m3adqkut45.fsf@defun.localdomain> (Jesper Harder's message of
 "Tue, 28 May 2002 18:36:42 +0200")
Original-Lines: 23
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.90
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45016
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45016

Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk> writes:

> Ah, right.  We need to narrow to the headers before unfolding them:

I have slightly different code.  It's not clear to me which is
better.  Does anyone have opinions?

      (let ((message-reply-buffer gnus-article-copy)
	    (message-reply-headers
	     ;; The headers are decoded.
	     (with-current-buffer gnus-article-copy
	       (save-excursion
		 (rfc2047-unfold-region (point-min)
					(progn
					  (search-forward "\n\n")
					  (point))))
	       (nnheader-parse-head t))))
	(message-yank-original)
	(setq beg (or beg (mark t))))

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!