From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38371 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: N versus . for unseen messages Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:42:57 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174245 22029 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 13997 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 20:43:25 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 20:43:25 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id WAA14690 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:42:58 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id WAA10088; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:42:58 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id AAD77206B; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:42:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 19 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38371 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38371 Some of my unseen messages are marked `N', some are marked `.'. It's clear to me that `N' is used only in nnimap groups, but then why do I sometimes see `.' in nnimap groups? May I suggest to unify the two marks? Also, I have the strange feeling (nothing substantial, though) that sometimes not all articles are marked `N' (or `.') that should be marked like that. The vague feeling is that the first new message in a group does not get the N mark, whereas the second and subsequent messages do. Oh, boy, what a wonderful report. I should really know better. But then, maybe some of you have already seen this? If not, I'll try to figure out what happens for real. kai -- Symbol's function definition is void: signature