From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32378
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus and mailto:
Date: 09 Sep 2000 11:46:01 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vafits5aofa.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <m2u2c2pj84.fsf@melvin.linuxpunks.net>
	<200009051436.PAA09834@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
	<m2ya15zosl.fsf@melvin.linuxpunks.net>
	<200009082230.XAA16777@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168657 19384 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:50:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:50:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D44D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sat,  9 Sep 2000 05:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAC09656;
	Sat, 9 Sep 2000 04:46:32 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 09 Sep 2000 04:45:50 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA12559
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 04:45:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37A5D051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat,  9 Sep 2000 05:46:03 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id LAA00471; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 11:46:02 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA23106; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 11:46:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA23708;
	Sat, 9 Sep 2000 11:46:01 +0200
Original-To: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: Dave Love's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2000 23:30:03 +0100"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 20
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32378
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32378

On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Dave Love wrote:

>>>>>> "DR" == David Roth <david@linuxpunks.net> writes:
> 
>  DR> thanks for both yours and Kai's reply.  I should have mentioned
>  DR> that I wished to use gnus-group-mail instead of compose-mail.
> 
> I don't understand why, if you're not in a Gnus group.

(gnus-group-mail is used when NOT in a group; when in a group,
gnus-summary-mail or gnus-summary-mail-other-window is used.)

Using gnus-group-mail rather than message-mail has the advantage that
the former deals with Gcc headers.  Lots of people (well, more than a
dozen or so) have expressed the wish of having Gcc headers when
composing a message from BBDB, say.

kai
-- 
I like BOTH kinds of music.