From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7199 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Deleting Expired Mail Date: 15 Jul 1996 07:41:28 +0200 Sender: grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.52) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147542 6257 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:59:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA11569 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 1996 22:58:09 -0700 Original-Received: from floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.40]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 07:41:43 +0200 Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de by floyd.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.7.5/UniDo 3.11) id HAA13901; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 07:41:32 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA17629; Mon, 15 Jul 96 07:41:29 +0200 Original-To: Joe Wells In-Reply-To: Joe Wells's message of 14 Jul 1996 16:38:41 -0400 Original-Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.35/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7199 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7199 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> When an expirable article reaches a certain age, it is Lars> deleted. >>>>> On 14 Jul 1996 16:38:41 -0400, Joe Wells said: Joe> Is this "age" the amount of time since the message reached you Joe> or the amount of time since it was marked expirable? For nnml, this is the modified-time of the underlying file. (For nnmh too, I guess.) I don't know what time is being used for other backends, though. AFAIK this area is considered to be open for improvement -- IMHO using the modified-time of the file is a suboptimal solution. kai -- Life is hard and then you die.