From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17984 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Do stuff on nnchoke-accept-article? Date: 20 Oct 1998 13:30:29 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156586 3718 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:29:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA29597 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 07:31:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB01406; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 06:31:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 20 Oct 1998 06:31:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA01438 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 06:31:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA29586 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 07:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from ramses.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.180]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP id NAA15732 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 13:30:38 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: (grossjoh@localhost) by ramses.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id NAA07850; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 13:30:36 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "19 Oct 1998 22:12:47 +0200" Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070035 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.35) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17984 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17984 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > It is, but that is the function that's called way, way deep down > in the code when splitting mail. Are you saying that nnfolder-request-accept-article is circumvented when splitting mail? If it isn't circumvented, then the `do stuff on nnchoke-request-accept-article' mechanism ought to work. kai -- In Turkey, we played well and lost. In Moldavia, we played badly and won. This raises the question: which is better? (Oliver Kahn, German soccer team)