From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46430 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Splitting on mail contents? (using spam-stat.el) Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:05:23 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <03bs7em0a4.fsf@msgid.viggen.net> <03y9ahlu15.fsf@msgid.viggen.net> <87sn0nnmeg.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87sn0mj83a.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031425602 21691 127.0.0.1 (7 Sep 2002 19:06:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17nkum-0005dg-00 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17nkuL-0004WT-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 14:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 14:06:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04646 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 14:06:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 5958 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2002 19:05:56 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5953 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2002 19:05:56 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 19:05:56 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g87J5T818573; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:05:29 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id VAA15590; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:05:24 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id D3D7A3AFDE; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:05:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Alex Schroeder Mail-Followup-To: Alex Schroeder , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 19:17:03 +0200") Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46430 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46430 Simon Josefsson writes: > Yes. The buffer name should probably be stored in a variable. Only > problem would be that people are already using the two hard coded > buffer names... having two variables and keeping the two buffer names > seems like a possibility but perhaps it is not that important? Having > one buffer name would be better. The variable could be updated to contain the right value at the right times... kai -- A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)