Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Cc: <ding@gnus.org>
Subject: Re: `new' indicator for nnimap groups?
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 17:51:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafofpyxxwz.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108021729560.19820-100000@lie.extundo.com> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2001 17:32:33 +0200 (CEST)")

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> Ah, I thought we we're talking about how to optimize away the
> unnecessary (re-)selecting of mailboxes to get the \Recent flag to
> be useful. To get that to work, we can't have the old system still
> in place.  But yes, it could be done in steps.

Oh, boy.  I think I was in the wrong thread.  This threads tree stuff
is no good -- it shows me a nice tree but I can't see the subject
anymore :-(

Argh.

Sorry.

Don't worry too much about this \Recent flag, though.  Lots of people
have been asking about a more correct unread count in the group buffer
and in the check against gnus-large-newsgroup.  So let's satisfy them.

Any takers?

kai
-- 
~/.signature: No such file or directory


  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-02 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-28 11:25 Kai Großjohann
2001-07-28 13:44 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-07-28 16:18   ` Kai Großjohann
2001-07-28 21:34     ` Amos Gouaux
2001-07-28 21:49       ` Karl Kleinpaste
2001-07-28 22:32       ` Kai Großjohann
2001-07-28 23:24         ` Simon Josefsson
2001-07-28 23:01     ` Simon Josefsson
2001-07-28 23:12       ` Kai Großjohann
2001-07-28 23:49         ` Simon Josefsson
2001-07-29 21:07           ` Kai Großjohann
2001-07-30 11:09             ` Simon Josefsson
2001-07-30 12:52               ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-02 10:54                 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-02 12:08                   ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-02 13:51                     ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-02 15:05                       ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-02 15:32                         ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-02 15:51                           ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2001-07-28 13:46 ` Amos Gouaux
2001-07-28 20:10 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2001-08-05 13:15 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-05 16:59   ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-05 20:31     ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-11 17:01       ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-11 23:00         ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-12 16:59           ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-12 17:41             ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-12 18:03               ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 20:34   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 21:14     ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-17 21:28       ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 22:01         ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 22:23           ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 22:30             ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-17 22:35               ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 22:44                 ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-17 22:46                   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-18  3:28                   ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-18  8:46                     ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-19  3:32                       ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-17 23:02                 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-18  9:20                 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-18  9:47                   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-27 16:59                 ` Sudish Joseph
2001-08-27 17:46                   ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-28  0:21                     ` Amos Gouaux
2001-08-28  0:28                     ` Amos Gouaux
2001-08-17 23:00             ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 23:02               ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-18  0:44         ` Joe Casadonte
2001-08-18  2:27           ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-18 11:44             ` Joe Casadonte
2001-08-18  9:04         ` Simon Josefsson
2001-08-27 16:47         ` Sudish Joseph
2001-08-18  0:41       ` Joe Casadonte
2001-08-18 15:34         ` Kai Großjohann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vafofpyxxwz.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
    --to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).