From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36996 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-message-archive-method is confusing Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:27:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172489 11539 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:54:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19449 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2001 18:28:00 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2001 18:28:00 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id UAA08671 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:27:33 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id UAA24372; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:27:32 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id UAA27617; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:27:32 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:33:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105 Original-Lines: 30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36996 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36996 On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Paul Jarc wrote: > How does gnus-outgoing-message-group relate to all this? Is it > obsoleted by g-m-a-g? Or used for something slightly different? If I remember correctly, I had an exchange like this with Lars: Me: So, what's the difference between gnus-outgoing-message-group and gnus-message-archive-group? Lars: The former is older. Me: So, is gnus-outgoing-message-group going to go away? Lars: No. I'm not sure what to make of this... IMVHO the two ways are not needed. But on the other hand it seems that using gnus-message-archive-group means that the Gcc header is not inserted in all cases. Hm. Ah, yes, maybe it has to do with the gcc-self group parameter. Yeah, I think with gnus-outgoing-message-group and the gcc-self parameter you get two Gcc headers, but with gnus-message-archive-group and the gcc-self parameter you get only one (the gcc-self one). Can anyone confirm this? kai -- ~/.signature: No such file or directory