From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36171 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: different thread sorting rules for one group? Date: 09 May 2001 22:44:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171801 7140 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:43:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 18849 invoked by alias); 9 May 2001 20:44:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18844 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 20:44:47 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 May 2001 20:44:47 -0000 Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id WAA04282; Wed, 9 May 2001 22:44:17 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id WAA20063; Wed, 9 May 2001 22:44:17 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id WAA09776; Wed, 9 May 2001 22:44:17 +0200 X-Face: 6=pZ4hVbjN:C?j1$h/-bi4:F%*~B#Rxb$[0%!{5NK"dE:_QRAM]Dzl=$yMu%Rh4xCSm/#>! $n%@SHJ](KFJKL,uF\=G=bRJQC$ ?+Dlxu*pj.Z,-GK<~y7sd/l*PN\]>} In-Reply-To: (Bill White's message of "08 May 2001 06:03:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 13 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36171 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36171 On 08 May 2001, Bill White wrote: > | (gnus-thread-sort-functions > | '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number gnus-thread-sort-by-date)) Looks like the tick should not be there. Does it help to use `G c' rather than `G p' to frob the group parameters? It ought to help avoid Lisp errors like this. kai -- The passive voice should never be used.