From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46842 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Limit summary to participant Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:51:38 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033393980 8774 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2002 13:53:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17w0yo-0002HE-00 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:52:58 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17w0yK-0007fn-00; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:53:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA24888 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:52:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 27271 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 13:52:11 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 27266 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 13:52:10 -0000 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42) by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 13:52:10 -0000 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g8UDph825769 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:51:44 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id PAA10165; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:51:38 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id 533563B611; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Maciej Matysiak's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:16:38 +0200") Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46842 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46842 Maciej Matysiak writes: > On the 30th of September 2002 at 12:01, Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.D= E (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote: > >> You can add To and Cc to nnmail-extra-headers and gnus-extra-headers. > > what's the difference between nnmail-extra-headers and gnus-extra-headers? > for both 'c-h v' says: extra headers to parse. are they redundant? nnmail-extra-headers means to insert them into the overview/NOV data for nnml and nnfolder (and other backends supporting NOV). gnus-extra-headers means, I think, to extract them from the overview/NOV data when present. Also, some backends don't have NOV and so this variable means (I think) to extract them from the headers. For example, if your NNTP server provides some headers as extra headers, then you don't need nnmail-extra-headers. But indeed, there is great overlap in their use, so maybe they should be unified. Opinions? kai --=20 ~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn (Frank Nobis)